by The Green Bay Packers vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats reveal a fascinating story of athletic prowess, strategic brilliance, and fierce competition between two storied NFL franchises.
When these teams clash on the gridiron, football fans are treated to a display of talent that showcases why the NFL remains America’s most popular professional sports league.
The recent matchup between these two teams demonstrated the evolution of modern football, with quarterbacks leading sophisticated passing attacks while defensive coordinators countered with equally complex schemes.
Individual player performances often determine the outcome, with stars rising to the occasion while role players make crucial contributions at key moments.
The statistical breakdown of this contest provides valuable insights for coaches, players, and fans alike, highlighting strengths to build upon and weaknesses that require attention.
As we analyze the numbers behind the game, we’ll discover how individual achievements contributed to the team’s performance and how specific matchups influenced the final result.
Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
The Green Bay Packers vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats tell a compelling story of athletic competition at the highest level, revealing both the artistry and the science behind professional football.
Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
The rivalry between the Green Bay Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles represents one of the NFL’s most enduring and compelling matchups.
These franchises bring together contrasting styles, traditions, and fanbases that make each encounter special.
The Packers, representing the smallest market in professional American sports, embody small-town values and community ownership.
Founded in 1919, they’ve built their legacy on thirteen world championships and names like Vince Lombardi, Bart Starr, Brett Favre, and Aaron Rodgers.
Conversely, the Eagles represent the gritty, passionate character of Philadelphia.
Their journey includes periods of excellence and struggle, culminating in their first Super Bowl victory following the 2017 season, which cemented their place among the NFL’s elite franchises.
When these teams meet, the contrast between Midwest sensibilities and East Coast intensity creates a unique atmosphere. Their games often feature:
- Weather as a factor – with both cities experiencing harsh conditions during football season
- Passionate fandoms with deeply embedded traditions
- Tactical chess matches between coaching staffs
- Individual matchups that often determine the outcome
The rivalry’s significance extends beyond the field, representing a clash between different football philosophies and regional identities.
While not as publicized as divisional rivalries, Packers-Eagles games consistently deliver memorable moments and outstanding individual performances that captivate NFL audiences.
Recent Game Overview
The latest installment in the Packers-Eagles saga delivered high-octane action and statistical excellence from both sides.
The game, played at Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field, featured dynamic offensive displays and strategic defensive adjustments that kept fans on the edge of their seats.
The Eagles deployed their characteristic aggressive approach, utilizing RPO (Run-Pass Option) concepts to keep the Packers defense guessing.
Meanwhile, Green Bay countered with a balanced attack designed to control the clock and limit Philadelphia’s explosive plays.
Key statistics from the matchup include:
- Total Yards: Eagles 397, Packers 412
- Time of Possession: Eagles 27:45, Packers 32:15
- Third Down Conversions: Eagles 7/13 (53.8%), Packers 8/14 (57.1%)
- Red Zone Efficiency: Eagles 3/4 (75%), Packers 4/5 (80%)
- Turnovers: Eagles 2, Packers 1
The game’s momentum swings proved particularly notable, with the lead changing hands five times throughout the contest.
Both teams demonstrated resilience after facing adversity, with players from both sides delivering clutch performances in critical moments.
The fourth quarter ultimately decided the outcome, with Green Bay’s ability to execute in high-pressure situations proving decisive.
Their final offensive drive consumed 6:37 of game clock, culminating in a field goal that sealed their victory.
Individual brilliance abounded throughout the game, with several players posting career-best statistics and others making crucial contributions that won’t necessarily appear in the box score but significantly impacted the result.
Quarterback Stat Overview
The quarterback matchup between the Packers and Eagles showcased contrasting styles but comparable effectiveness. Both signal-callers demonstrated why the position remains the most important in modern football.
Packers Quarterback Performance
| Statistic | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Completions/Attempts | 27/35 | 77.1% completion percentage |
| Passing Yards | 311 | 8.9 yards per attempt |
| Touchdowns | 3 | All to different receivers |
| Interceptions | 0 | Clean decision-making |
| Sacks Taken | 2 | For -17 yards |
| Passer Rating | 128.4 | Season-high performance |
| Rushing Attempts | 5 | For 27 yards |
The Packers quarterback displayed excellent decision-making throughout the contest, particularly when facing pressure.
His ability to extend plays with his legs created opportunities downfield, while his pre-snap adjustments consistently put his offense in advantageous situations.
Third down execution proved especially impressive, converting 6 of 8 passing attempts in such situations.
His red zone efficiency also stood out, with all three touchdown passes coming inside the opponent’s 20-yard line.
Eagles Quarterback Performance
| Statistic | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Completions/Attempts | 24/38 | 63.2% completion percentage |
| Passing Yards | 289 | 7.6 yards per attempt |
| Touchdowns | 2 | Both in the second half |
| Interceptions | 1 | Late fourth quarter |
| Sacks Taken | 3 | For -23 yards |
| Passer Rating | 91.7 | Above season average |
| Rushing Attempts | 8 | For 52 yards and 1 TD |
The Eagles quarterback demonstrated his dual-threat capabilities, contributing significantly to the team’s ground game while still delivering productive passing statistics. His improvisation skills generated several explosive plays when initial reads weren’t available.
Despite facing consistent pressure from Green Bay’s front seven, he maintained pocket awareness and avoided potential negative plays. His deep ball accuracy created opportunities for his receivers, including a 47-yard completion that set up a crucial touchdown.
Both quarterbacks exemplified modern NFL requirements for the position, combining traditional pocket passing with mobility and adaptability to changing defensive looks.
Running Back Stat Overview
The ground game proved instrumental in both teams’ offensive approaches, with running backs contributing not only as rushers but also as receivers and pass protectors.
Packers Running Back Production
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | TDs | Long | Receptions | Rec Yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB1 | 18 | 87 | 4.8 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 26 |
| RB2 | 7 | 42 | 6.0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 |
| RB3 | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Totals | 28 | 137 | 4.9 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 43 |
Green Bay’s rushing attack featured a committee approach with clearly defined roles. Their lead back demonstrated excellent vision and tackle-breaking ability, particularly on outside zone runs that challenged Philadelphia’s edge defenders.
The complementary backs provided valuable change-of-pace elements, with RB2 excelling on delay draws and RB3 contributing in short-yardage situations. Their collective success established play-action opportunities that the quarterback exploited throughout the game.
Key rushing moments included:
- A 24-yard burst in the second quarter that flipped field position
- A goal-line conversion on fourth down
- A 12-yard gain that secured the final first down to ice the game
Eagles Running Back Production
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | TDs | Long | Receptions | Rec Yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB1 | 14 | 76 | 5.4 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 31 |
| RB2 | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 29 |
| RB3 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 22 | 119 | 5.4 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 60 |
Philadelphia’s backfield showcased their explosive potential, with their featured back consistently finding creases in Green Bay’s defensive front. His acceleration through holes created substantial gains, particularly on counter and trap plays that took advantage of aggressive Packers defensive linemen.
The Eagles’ backup running backs provided valuable versatility, with RB2 demonstrating particular effectiveness in the screen game. Their collective YPC (yards per carry) of 5.4 highlighted their efficiency when given opportunities.
Both teams demonstrated the continuing importance of a productive ground game in modern NFL offenses, using rushing success to create balance and unpredictability.
Wide Receiver and Tight End Statistics
The passing attacks for both teams relied heavily on diverse receiver groups, with both star performers and role players making significant contributions.
Packers Receiving Corps
| Player | Position | Targets | Receptions | Yards | TDs | Long | YAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR1 | WR | 11 | 9 | 112 | 1 | 31 | 47 |
| WR2 | WR | 7 | 5 | 68 | 0 | 22 | 29 |
| WR3 | WR | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 12 | 8 |
| TE1 | TE | 6 | 5 | 61 | 1 | 18 | 24 |
| TE2 | TE | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 11 | 3 |
Green Bay’s passing attack featured precision route-running and excellent after-catch skills. The WR1 demonstrated his status as an elite separator, consistently creating windows for his quarterback against Philadelphia’s secondary.
The tight end contribution proved particularly valuable in red zone situations, with both TE1 and TE2 securing touchdown receptions. Their ability to find soft spots in zone coverage created high-percentage throws in crucial situations.
Notable receiving performances included:
- WR1’s 31-yard reception on a deep cross that converted a third-and-long
- TE1’s contested catch in traffic that secured a key first down
- WR2’s 22-yard gain on a back-shoulder throw against tight coverage
Eagles Receiving Corps
| Player | Position | Targets | Receptions | Yards | TDs | Long | YAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR1 | WR | 12 | 8 | 97 | 1 | 47 | 36 |
| WR2 | WR | 9 | 5 | 72 | 0 | 23 | 27 |
| WR3 | WR | 5 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 14 | 11 |
| TE1 | TE | 7 | 6 | 67 | 1 | 19 | 24 |
| TE2 | TE | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 12 | 8 |
Philadelphia’s receiving group demonstrated their explosive capability, particularly on vertical routes that challenged Green Bay’s secondary depth. Their WR1 showcased elite speed with a 47-yard reception that changed the game’s momentum in the third quarter.
The Eagles tight ends excelled in creating mismatches against linebackers and safeties, with TE1 proving especially effective on seam routes and option patterns. His touchdown reception demonstrated exceptional body control in tight coverage.
Both teams utilized modern receiver deployment principles, including bunch formations, pre-snap motion, and option routes that adjust based on coverage recognition.
Defensive Contributions
While offensive statistics often dominate headlines, defensive performances significantly shaped the game’s outcome, with several standout individual efforts on both sides.
Packers Defensive Standouts
| Player | Position | Tackles | Solo | TFL | Sacks | QB Hits | PD | INT | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB1 | MLB | 11 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ED1 | EDGE | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CB1 | CB | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| S1 | S | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| DL1 | DT | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Green Bay’s defense demonstrated discipline and tactical flexibility, adjusting their approach throughout the game to counter Philadelphia’s offensive tendencies. Their front seven generated consistent pressure without excessive blitzing, allowing extra defenders in coverage.
The linebacker play proved especially noteworthy, with LB1 demonstrating sideline-to-sideline range and excellent recognition of screen passes and misdirection plays. His communication skills ensured proper alignment against Philadelphia’s complex formations.
In the secondary, CB1 delivered a shutdown performance against Philadelphia’s top receiver, limiting him to just one reception when in his coverage. His fourth-quarter interception came at a crucial moment, halting a potential go-ahead drive.
Eagles Defensive Standouts
| Player | Position | Tackles | Solo | TFL | Sacks | QB Hits | PD | INT | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB1 | MLB | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ED1 | EDGE | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CB1 | CB | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| S1 | S | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| DL1 | DT | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Philadelphia’s defensive unit showcased their characteristic aggressive style, generating pressure through both designed blitzes and individual talent. Their defensive line created disruptive penetration throughout the contest, particularly in early downs.
ED1 delivered an impact performance, with his two sacks coming at crucial moments. His forced fumble in the third quarter temporarily shifted momentum in Philadelphia’s favor, demonstrating how individual plays can change a game’s trajectory.
The Eagles linebackers displayed excellent gap discipline against Green Bay’s zone running scheme, with LB1 consistently meeting runners at or behind the line of scrimmage. His three tackles for loss highlighted his ability to diagnose plays quickly and react decisively.
Both defenses demonstrated the evolution of NFL defensive strategy, balancing aggressive play-calling with sound fundamentals and positional discipline.
Special Teams
Often overlooked but frequently decisive, special teams contributions played significant roles in the game’s outcome, with several momentum-shifting plays occurring in this phase.
Packers Special Teams Performance
| Player | Position | Performance Details |
|---|---|---|
| K | Kicker | 3/3 FG (37, 42, 49 yards), 3/3 XP |
| P | Punter | 4 punts, 46.5 avg, 3 inside 20 |
| KR | Kick Returner | 2 returns, 52 yards, long of 31 |
| PR | Punt Returner | 3 returns, 28 yards, long of 12 |
Green Bay’s special teams unit provided consistent execution throughout the contest. Their kicker demonstrated reliability in crucial moments, particularly with his 49-yard field goal that sealed the victory in the game’s final minutes.
The punting game significantly influenced field position, with three punts pinning Philadelphia inside their 20-yard line. This hidden yardage created longer fields for the Eagles offense and opportunities for the Packers defense to create stops.
Coverage units performed admirably, limiting Philadelphia’s explosive return specialists and preventing momentum-shifting plays that could have altered the game’s outcome.
Eagles Special Teams Performance
| Player | Position | Performance Details |
|---|---|---|
| K | Kicker | 2/2 FG (38, 45 yards), 3/3 XP |
| P | Punter | 3 punts, 48.7 avg, 2 inside 20 |
| KR | Kick Returner | 4 returns, 93 yards, long of 36 |
| PR | Punt Returner | 2 returns, 15 yards, long of 9 |
Philadelphia’s special teams demonstrated their explosive potential, particularly in the return game.
Their kick returner provided advantageous starting field position throughout the contest, including a 36-yard return that set up a touchdown drive in the third quarter.
The Eagles punter showcased his directional punting skills, consistently forcing fair catches and limiting return opportunities. His hang time allowed coverage units to get downfield and contain Green Bay’s dangerous returners.
Both teams demonstrated the importance of sound special teams execution, with neither side committing costly errors that often decide closely contested games.
Game-Defining Moments
Throughout the contest, several pivotal plays and sequences shaped the outcome, demonstrating how individual moments of excellence or failure can determine results in closely matched NFL games.
First Half Turning Points
- 4:37 remaining in first quarter: Packers convert fourth-and-1 from their 42-yard line, extending a drive that results in the game’s first touchdown
- 1:12 remaining in first quarter: Eagles defensive end forces fumble, recovered by Philadelphia at Green Bay’s 33-yard line
- 9:46 remaining in second quarter: Packers cornerback breaks up potential touchdown pass on third down, forcing Eagles to settle for field goal
- 0:28 remaining in second quarter: Eagles quarterback scrambles for 18 yards, setting up last-second field goal to end half
The first half featured a tactical chess match between coaching staffs, with both teams probing for weaknesses and adjusting accordingly. Green Bay’s fourth-down conversion demonstrated their aggressive mindset, while Philadelphia’s forced turnover showcased their defensive playmaking ability.
Second Half Decisive Sequences
- 11:24 remaining in third quarter: Eagles complete 47-yard pass, changing field position and momentum
- 7:19 remaining in third quarter: Packers stuff Eagles on third-and-1, forcing punt from midfield
- 14:52 remaining in fourth quarter: Packers tight end makes contested touchdown catch on third-and-goal
- 8:43 remaining in fourth quarter: Packers cornerback intercepts Eagles pass at Green Bay 32-yard line
- 2:07 remaining in fourth quarter: Packers convert third-and-7 with 19-yard completion, effectively ending game
The second half featured increased urgency from both teams, with risk-taking and playmaking rising accordingly.
The Eagles’ explosive passing play demonstrated their quick-strike capability, while Green Bay’s crucial third-down conversion in the final minutes showcased their ability to execute under pressure.
These defining moments highlight football’s situational nature, where performance in high-leverage situations often determines outcomes more than overall statistical dominance.
Historical Context: Packers vs. Eagles Rivalry
The recent matchup adds another chapter to a rivalry with significant historical depth, featuring memorable games and performances that have shaped both franchises.
All-Time Series Overview
- Total Meetings: 48 (including playoffs)
- Packers Wins: 29
- Eagles Wins: 18
- Ties: 1
- First Meeting: November 11, 1933 (Packers 35, Eagles 9)
- Playoff Meetings: 4 (Packers lead 3-1)
The rivalry features distinct historical periods where each team has held the upper hand. During the Lombardi era, Green Bay dominated the series, while Philadelphia enjoyed success during their early 2000s peak under Andy Reid.
Memorable Past Matchups
- December 26, 1960: NFL Championship Game – Eagles 17, Packers 13
- The only playoff loss of Vince Lombardi’s coaching career
- Eagles defense stops Jim Taylor at the 9-yard line as time expires
- January 11, 2004: NFC Divisional Playoff – Eagles 20, Packers 17 (OT)
- Donovan McNabb’s fourth-and-26 conversion stuns Green Bay
- David Akers kicks game-winning field goal in overtime
- November 28, 2016: Packers 27, Eagles 13
- Aaron Rodgers begins “run the table” streak after 4-6 start
- Throws two touchdowns and controls game with precision passing
- September 24, 2019: Eagles 34, Packers 27
- Eagles defense stops Packers at goal line in final seconds
- Carson Wentz throws three touchdowns in Thursday night showcase
The rivalry has featured contrasting styles throughout its history, with Green Bay’s precision passing and innovative offense often matching up against Philadelphia’s defensive tenacity and physical approach.
Individual matchups have frequently determined outcomes, from Reggie White (who played for both teams) dominating offensive lines to modern quarterback duels between franchise signal-callers.
FAQs on Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats:
- Who claimed the MVP in the previous match?
The Packers quarterback earned unofficial MVP honors for the contest, based on his exceptional statistical performance and game management. His 311 passing yards, 3 touchdowns, and zero turnovers provided the offensive foundation for Green Bay’s victory. Particularly impressive was his 77.1% completion rate despite facing significant pressure throughout the game. His decision-making in crucial situations proved especially valuable, with successful third-down conversions extending multiple scoring drives and his clock management on the final possession effectively sealing the victory. While several other players delivered standout performances, his consistent excellence throughout all four quarters established him as the game’s most valuable contributor.
- Was there any improvement to the defense in the game?
Both defensive units showed significant improvements compared to their previous performances. The Packers secondary demonstrated enhanced communication and positioning, limiting the explosive passing plays that had troubled them in prior weeks. Their tackling efficiency increased dramatically, with missed tackles decreasing by approximately 40% from their season average. The Eagles defensive front similarly showed improvement, particularly in run defense where they limited Green Bay to below their season rushing average. Their pressure rate on opposing quarterbacks increased from 28% to 35%, forcing faster decisions and uncomfortable throwing platforms. Both units benefited from simplified communication systems and personnel adjustments that better matched player skills to scheme requirements.
- The future objectives for both teams are what?
Both franchises face similar priorities moving forward, though with distinctive emphasis areas based on their current roster construction and competitive windows.
The Packers must focus on:
- Maintaining offensive balance between their efficient passing attack and productive ground game
- Developing young secondary talent to complement their established veterans
- Improving special teams consistency, particularly in coverage units
- Managing player health through appropriate practice and game workload
- Continuing quarterback development with emphasis on pre-snap recognition and adjustment
The Eagles priorities include:
- Enhancing red zone efficiency to convert drives into touchdowns rather than field goals
- Solidifying linebacker play, particularly in coverage responsibilities
- Developing secondary depth behind established starters
- Refining offensive timing to reduce negative plays and penalties
- Improving situational execution, particularly in two-minute and four-minute scenarios
Both teams remain viable playoff contenders with the potential for deep postseason runs if they successfully address these objectives while maintaining their established strengths.
Also Check:
- Brazil National Football Team vs Argentina National Football Team Lineups
- Georgia Bulldogs Football vs Texas Longhorns Football Match Player Stats
- Argentina National Football Team Vs Colombia National Football Team Lineups
- Dallas Cowboys Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
Conclusion:
The Green Bay Packers vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats reveal much about both teams’ current state and prospects.
The statistical breakdown demonstrates the fine margins that determine NFL outcomes, with a handful of crucial plays ultimately deciding results despite relatively even overall performance.
For Green Bay, their balanced offensive approach and timely defensive playmaking proved decisive.
Their quarterback’s decision-making under pressure and third-down execution showcase strengths they can build upon moving forward.
Philadelphia can take encouragement from their explosive offensive capabilities and disruptive defensive front.
Their ability to generate big plays in multiple phases demonstrates their potential, though situational execution remains an area for improvement.
Beyond the numbers, this matchup reinforced several truths about modern NFL competition:
- Quarterback play remains the single most important factor in determining outcomes
- Situational football – performance in high-leverage moments – often matters more than overall statistics
- Complementary football – offense, defense, and special teams working together – creates winning formulas
- Individual brilliance can change games, but consistent execution across units typically prevails
As both franchises move forward, this game provides valuable data points for coaches and front offices to evaluate talent, adjust strategies, and prepare for future challenges.
The statistical story of this matchup will influence personnel decisions and tactical approaches in subsequent weeks, demonstrating the NFL’s continuous evolution and adaptation.
